›
Post on second adhyaya.
After discussing first ovi from
first adhyaya, when I started looking for one ovi from the second adhyaya for
discussion in this post, I was really placed in a difficult situation. Many
experts on Bhagwad Geeta feel that Second adhyaya is the essence of entire
teaching of Lord Krishna. It tells us what is Sankhya yoga and what is Karma
yoga. It gives characteristic identification marks of a Sthitapradnya i.e. one
whose mind and intellect are steady and merged in contemplation of the Brahman.
Some critiques of Geeta feel that in the last shloka of this adhyaya, the Lord
has summed up his teaching to Arjuna by describing the Brahmi Sthiti (i.e. the
status gained by a yogi after his self merges in the Brahman). And that the
subsequent adhyayas of Geeta deal only with elaboration of theoretical concepts
and practical application of Buddhi yoga, Karma yoga and Bhakti yoga. Such
being the importance of this adhyaya, it was a challenge to explain ideas contained
in the second adhyaya by referring to any one ovi singularly. Rightly or
wrongly, I settled on the following ovi for this purpose. In any case, after serially
discussing one ovi each from all eighteen adhyayas in the first round, we will
discuss remaining important ovis from each adhyaya again in due course.
अर्जुना समत्व चित्ताचें
। तेंचि सार जाण योगाचें ।
जेथ मना आणि बुद्धीचें । ऐक्य आथी ।।2-273।।
2-273. O Arjuna, equilibrium
of mind in any given situation is the essence of yoga wherein mind and
intellect of a yogi together converge in the Divinity (in a non-attached way).
As
this ovi is based on Buddhi yoga (path of intellectual union with the Supreme
Self), before we analyze it, let us first understand Buddhi yoga. This
expression appears in Bhagwad Geeta for the first time in Shloka 39 of second
adhyaya, where the Lord tells Arjuna that so far. I have explained the knowledge
to you from the view point of Sankhya philosophy; now listen to the same from
the point of view of buddhi yoga. Then in Shloka 48 of the same adhyaya, the
word yoga has been defined as “samatwam yoga uchyate” meaning thereby that equilibrium
(i. e. evenness or equability or equanimity) of mind and intellect in
favourable or unfavourable circumstances is called as yoga. Thereafter in
Shloka 50, yoga has been further qualified by saying that “yogah karmasu
kaushalam” means yoga is the skill and efficiency in performance of karmas
(actions). Further, in Shloka 23 of sixth adhyaya, yoga has been defined as
elimination of sorrows and severance from union with pain. Here, I would like
to caution that while reading all these definitions, the word yoga should not be
construed in the sense in which it appears in the Patanjal-yoga. Because,
though exact period of Patanjal-yogadarshana is not known, its commentators say that it
has come into existence much later than Bhagwad Geeta. Certain aphorisms of
Patanjal yoga do look similar to some instructions regarding yogic practice contained
in sixth adhyaya of Bhagwad Geeta. This similarity is likely to cause confusion
in the mind of a common reader; however, on close examination, essence of the yoga
contemplated in Patanjal-yoga-Sutras and the Buddhi yoga espoused by Lord
Krishna would both be found as widely different concepts. Such difference would be
understood more clearly if someone starts practicing these two systems of yoga. Suffice it to remember for the present that there is difference in them. We
will examine this issue in detail when we reach discussion on sixth adhyaya of
Dnyaneshwari. In the present context, I would like to say something more about
Buddhi yoga. Swami Chinmayananda has commented on Buddhi yoga in his Book ‘the
Holy Geeta’, as under:
“Here the term,’Buddhi yoga’ has tickled
some commentators to discover in it a special yoga advised by the Geeta. I
personally think that it is too much of a labored theory. Buddhi as defined in
Upanishads is the determining factor in the inner equipment; Nishchyatmika is
intellect; Sanshayatmika is mind. Thus, when the thought flow is in a state of
flux and agitated, it is called mind and when it is single pointed, calm and
serene in its own determination, it is called the intellect. Thus, Buddhi yoga
means ‘to be established in the devotion to the intellect.’ Steady in your
conviction, your mind perfectly under the control of your discriminative
intellect, to live thus as a master of your inner and outer world is called
Buddhi yoga.......We may interpret Buddhi yoga as an individual’s attempt to
live and act from the zone of the intellect which freely controls the mind’s
functions and readily receives faithful obedience from the mind…….Thus, when an
individual completely surrenders his ego, he is said to be established in
Buddhi yoga.”
While considering the above view of
Swami Chinmayananda, we will have to keep in mind Shloka 39 of 2nd
adhyaya. As mentioned in it, Lord himself has told Arjuna that so far I
explained to you the Sankhya philosophy; I will now explain that knowledge from
the view point of Buddhi yoga. Then, after explaining quite a few concepts and
practices of yoga in subsequent eight adhyayas, the Lord concluded in the 10th
Shloka of 10th adhyaya saying that I confer buddhi yoga on those
devotees, who constantly and lovingly remain engrossed in yoga and my worship.
By practicing that Buddhi yoga, they can reach my kingdom. In other words,
Buddhi yoga is not something practiced by the aspirants of moksha. It is a
reward bestowed by the Lord on the eligible devotees by uniting their buddhi
with the Supreme Self. (The Lord does it through embodiment of the Guru of the devotee). With this affirmation about Buddhi yoga by Lord Krishna
himself, I do not see any reason for not accepting Buddhi yoga as an
independent mode of yoga like Bhakti yoga, Karma yoga or Dnyana yoga propounded by the Lord in Bhagwad Geeta. All the
aspirants practicing these yogas have only one final goal and that is union
with the Brahman. For a student of Dnyaneshwari practicing Kundalini yoga as
described by Sant Dnyaneshwar in sixth adhyaya, the concept of Buddhi yoga is
all the more important from practical and experimental point of view. If a yogi
has to win over the enemy in the form of Kama i.e. desire or passion (as described in Shlokas 42 and
43 of third adhyaya of Geeta, he has to perceive and reach the subtlest form of
Buddhi, which is beyond all senses and then only he can attain the final
beatitude i.e. moksha. My Guru, Shri Bappasaheb Rushipathak had a firm view that promulgation of concept of Buddhi yoga is the special
contribution and invention of Lord Shrikrishna in the spiritual science after
deep study and churning of the ocean of the then prevailing knowledge of Vedas
and Upanishads.
Coming
back to the ovi to be discussed, can I take liberty to do so in our next post
on this blog? Thanks.
Can you mention some more views of god-men,critics on Buddhiyoga?
ReplyDeleteShekhar Gadgil